1. IMPORTANT - NEW & EXISTING MEMBERS

    E-MAIL SERVER ISSUES

    We are currently experiencing issues with our outgoing email server, therefore EXISTING members will not be getting any alert emails, and NEW/PROSPECTIVE members will not receive the email they need to confirm their account. This matter has been escalated, however the technician responsible is currently on annual leave.For assistance, in the first instance, please PM any/all of the admin team (if you can), alternatively please send an email to:

    [email protected]

    We will endeavour to help as quickly as we can.
    Dismiss Notice

The age old electricity question?!?!?!

Discussion in 'General Gardening Discussion' started by dodgie, Aug 18, 2008.

  1. Pro Gard

    Pro Gard Gardener

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Messages:
    3,325
    Ratings:
    +6
    In answer to you BAS, yes and no.

    If a job involves an outdoor suply then pass the electrical work onto a spark who is willing to be flexible so to speak. I dont invoice nor make any conections and it isnt my problem. His contract is with the customer and not me.

    Of course some folk are content to have 45cm trenches dug for SWA cable to be buried.
     
  2. ban-all-sheds

    ban-all-sheds Gardener

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2008
    Messages:
    56
    Ratings:
    +0
    That's useful.


    If you mean one who is prepared to flout the regulations and falsify documentation then that is a dreadful suggestion - you should neither do it nor recommend that others do it.


    And my - don't you serve your customers well by involving a cowboy.


    Content or not, if that is what is required then that is what is required.
     
  3. Pro Gard

    Pro Gard Gardener

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Messages:
    3,325
    Ratings:
    +6
    "If you mean one who is prepared to flout the regulations and falsify documentation then that is a dreadful suggestion - you should neither do it nor recommend that others do it."


    Undeniably better than the customer doing it themselves and using blue pipe and flex or similar


    "And my - don't you serve your customers well by involving a cowboy."

    I like to think so, the guy i recomend is fully qulified, how he conducts his business is his afair.


    "Content or not, if that is what is required then that is what is required."

    80 % of the time that is the option that is taken, in some instances it isnt practical though, this is when the SWA may end up in sectional galvanised conduit secured to the fence.


    Back to the origional subject.
     
  4. ban-all-sheds

    ban-all-sheds Gardener

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2008
    Messages:
    56
    Ratings:
    +0
    I'm sorry that you find the truth unpalatable or inconvenient, but no matter if that is better it is unlawful. There is no reason not to do it properly and lawfully.

    And you should not advise or facilitate doing it improperly or unlawfully.


    He may well be fully qualified, but if he deliberately incorporates illegal working into his business practices he is a cowboy and guilty of gross professional misconduct.


    Note I did say "if that is what is required". The regulations don't demand that the cable be buried, just that it be installed in such a way that it won't be damaged during installation, or by use, or by external influences.

    If galvanised conduit above ground complies with the regulations and is otherwise acceptable to the owner then there's no reason not to do it that way, and in that case there is no need for "a spark who is willing to be flexible so to speak".


    But this is clearly a description of an illegal act.

    Neither of you should be doing it - as well as it being illegal it is professional misconduct, and you are not acting in the best interests of your client by conspiring to carry out illegal work for him.


    OK.

    I can give dodgie advice on how to do it properly, but does he want that, or does he want confirmation that it's OK to not do it properly?
     
  5. Freddy

    Freddy Miserable git, well known for it

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    9,461
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired - yay!
    Location:
    Bristol
    Ratings:
    +12,508
    Oh dear, it's all getting a bit boring and repetitive :(
     
  6. JWK

    JWK Gardener Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2008
    Messages:
    30,889
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Surrey
    Ratings:
    +46,178
    You should have left it at 'True' because I never said that the wiring regs can be disregarded, it’s plainly obvious that they should be followed. I have never mentioned anything about the nanny state either, but since you have brought it up I think it’s good, for instance it provides us with protection from cowboys who might claim to be electricians:

    http://www.competentperson.co.uk/index.asp

    Folks, the above website lets us check if an electrician is competent i.e. properly trained, qualified and certified (similar to the Corgi scheme for gas). Ban-All-Sheds is not listed there as he’s already said.

    When I need an electrician to wire up my water feature, I will only use a competent person, after all I don’t want to electrocute myself or even worse break the law
     
  7. Freddy

    Freddy Miserable git, well known for it

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    9,461
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired - yay!
    Location:
    Bristol
    Ratings:
    +12,508
  8. ban-all-sheds

    ban-all-sheds Gardener

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2008
    Messages:
    56
    Ratings:
    +0
    Yes, I'm sorry - it looked as if my remark was aimed at you because you'd said that - it wasn't.

    I agree with you, and I have nothing against DIY electrical work, and I agree that any DIYer can do work safely, but it seemed apposite to highlight that some of the attitudes here:

    are not philosophies that should be adopted by DIYers who do want their work to come up to scratch.


    Oh I think electrocution is worse than breaking the law...:)

    But there's no need for it - it isn't rocket science - no reason why you couldn't wire it up safely.
     
  9. nickp

    nickp Gardener

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2008
    Messages:
    158
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Surrey
    Ratings:
    +12
  10. water-garden

    water-garden Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    Yes, Im am sure.
    I believe its to do with the word "fence"

    One person could call a few pieces of timber that are falling down a fence, others would call it an eye sore.

    My point is fences by their nature "fall down" at some point, a wall doesn't. there are so many variables you could say are still a fence, but at the end of the day, if its not strong its not strong, so better safe than sorry, don't fix cables to fences. Never a problem then.
     
  11. nickp

    nickp Gardener

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2008
    Messages:
    158
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Surrey
    Ratings:
    +12

    I've seen plenty of walls that have fallen down. One person could call a few rows of loose bricks a wall, other would call it an accident waiting to happen.

    Surely, it's a matter of stability and strength, regardless of the material it's made from.
     
  12. water-garden

    water-garden Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    You could say this and I could say that,we could keep on for hours, still does not change the regs.
    If you want to fix a cable to a fence that is up to you. I wouldn't
     
  13. nickp

    nickp Gardener

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2008
    Messages:
    158
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Surrey
    Ratings:
    +12
    I understand ... but I have at least two electricians which will sign-off the job, they say there is no issue with it attached to the lower part of the fence and to even run it through my hedge.

    How can they do this if the regs explicitly say that you can't attach to a fence?
     
  14. water-garden

    water-garden Guest

    Ratings:
    +0


    Why ask me? (ask them)
    I can not speak for your electricians, perhaps they donâ??t have a conscience.

    The law of the land also says you can only drive at 70 mph max on a motorway. People drive faster than this, why? ask them.


    As i said
     
  15. pete

    pete Growing a bit of this and a bit of that....

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Messages:
    48,248
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Mid Kent
    Ratings:
    +86,047
    sorry I'll only but in just the once, promise.:flag:

    The answer to the question is, BECAUSE ITS STILL SAFE TO DO SO.:D
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice